Ders Adı Kodu Yarıyıl T+U Saat Kredi AKTS
Theorıes Of Internatıonal Relatıons (En) MES 517 0 3 + 0 3 6
Ön Koşul Dersleri
Önerilen Seçmeli Dersler
Dersin Dili İngilizce
Dersin Seviyesi YUKSEK_LISANS
Dersin Türü Seçmeli
Dersin Koordinatörü Arş.Gör. FURKAN HALİT YOLCU
Dersi Verenler
Dersin Yardımcıları
Dersin Kategorisi Diğer
Dersin Amacı

Ortadoğu Çalışmaları Yüksek Lisans öğrencilerine Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorilerini öğretmek.

Dersin İçeriği

1: General Introduction and information on course requirements
International Relations and Social Science
2: Normative International Relations Theory
3: Classical Realism
4: Structural Realism
5: Liberalism, Neoliberalism
6: The English School
7: Marxism
8: Critical Theory
9: Constructivism
10: Feminism
11: Poststructuralism
12::Postcolonialism
13: Green Theory

# Ders Öğrenme Çıktıları Öğretim Yöntemleri Ölçme Yöntemleri
1 Learns the theories of the IR Anlatım, Soru-Cevap, Beyin Fırtınası,
Hafta Ders Konuları Ön Hazırlık
1 General Introduction and information on course requirements International Relations and Social Science
2 Normative International Relations Theory
3 Classical Realism
4 Structural Realism
5 Liberalism, Neoliberalism
6 The English School
7 Marxism
8 Critical Theory
9 Constructivism
10 Feminism
11 Poststructuralism
12 Postcolonialism
13 Green Theory
14 International Relations Theory and Globalization
Kaynaklar
Ders Notu

• Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith: International Relations Theories, Oxford University Press, 2013.
• Robert Jackson and Georg Sørense: Introduction to International Relations Theories and Approaches, Oxford University Press,2012
• Alexander Wendt. 1992. “Anarchy Is What Stats Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2): 391-425
• Axelrod, Robert (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books, pp. 3-105, 145-91.
• Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Columbia U. Press., chs. 1,2,10.
• Doyle, Michael. 1986. “Liberalism in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 80 (4): 1151-69
• Fearon, James (1991). “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science,” World Politics, 43 (2), January: 169-95.
• Fearon, James and Alexander Wendt. 2002. “Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View,” in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, editors, Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage), 5372
• Finnemore. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Cornell U. Press.
• Hopf, Ted. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow 1955 and 1999. Cornell U. Press, ch. 1
• Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics, 1978.
• John Mearsheimer. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton Company. (TGPP)
• Keohane, Robert and Judith Goldstein (1993). Ideas and Foreign Policy, Cornell University Press, chs. 1, 7.
• Keohane, Robert, ed. Neorealism and Its Critics. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), chs. 6,7.
• Krasner, Stephen. 1999 Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. 1-42 and 153-219.
• Lake, David, and Robert Powell, eds. 1999. Strategic Choice and International Relations (Princeton U. Press), chs by Lake and Powell, Frieden, and Rogowski.
• Lake, David. 1996. “Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations,” International Organization, 50(1).
• Levy, Jack (1992). “Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping Through a Conceptual Minefield” International Organization, 48, 2, Spring, 279-312. (Review)
• Mearsheimer, John. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. NY: Norton. Chapters 1-3.
• Morgenthau, Hans. 1985. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (6th ed.), Knopf, pp. 1-51.
• Powell, Robert. 1991. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory.” American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1303 – 1320.
• Robert Keohane, ed. 1986. Neo-Realism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press. (NIC)
• Robert Keohane. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (AH)
• Ted Hopf. 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.” International Security 23(1): 170-200
• Thucydides. The Peloponnesian War. Book 1, paras 1-23, 66-88, 118-24, 140-46; Book 4, paras 37-51; BookV, Melian dialogue; Book 6, paras 84-116.
• Walt, Stephen 1999. “Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies,” International Security, 23, 4, 5-48, and responses in 24, 2, 56-73, 97-106.
• Walt, Stephen. The Origins of Alliances, chs 1,2.
• Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics, chs. 4-8.
• Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press. Ch.1, 5-8.

Ders Kaynakları

• Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith: International Relations Theories, Oxford University Press, 2013.
• Robert Jackson and Georg Sørense: Introduction to International Relations Theories and Approaches, Oxford University Press,2012
• Alexander Wendt. 1992. “Anarchy Is What Stats Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2): 391-425
• Axelrod, Robert (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books, pp. 3-105, 145-91.
• Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Columbia U. Press., chs. 1,2,10.
• Doyle, Michael. 1986. “Liberalism in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 80 (4): 1151-69
• Fearon, James (1991). “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science,” World Politics, 43 (2), January: 169-95.
• Fearon, James and Alexander Wendt. 2002. “Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View,” in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, editors, Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage), 5372
• Finnemore. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Cornell U. Press.
• Hopf, Ted. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow 1955 and 1999. Cornell U. Press, ch. 1
• Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics, 1978.
• John Mearsheimer. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton Company. (TGPP)
• Keohane, Robert and Judith Goldstein (1993). Ideas and Foreign Policy, Cornell University Press, chs. 1, 7.
• Keohane, Robert, ed. Neorealism and Its Critics. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), chs. 6,7.
• Krasner, Stephen. 1999 Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. 1-42 and 153-219.
• Lake, David, and Robert Powell, eds. 1999. Strategic Choice and International Relations (Princeton U. Press), chs by Lake and Powell, Frieden, and Rogowski.
• Lake, David. 1996. “Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations,” International Organization, 50(1).
• Levy, Jack (1992). “Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping Through a Conceptual Minefield” International Organization, 48, 2, Spring, 279-312. (Review)
• Mearsheimer, John. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. NY: Norton. Chapters 1-3.
• Morgenthau, Hans. 1985. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (6th ed.), Knopf, pp. 1-51.
• Powell, Robert. 1991. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory.” American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1303 – 1320.
• Robert Keohane, ed. 1986. Neo-Realism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press. (NIC)
• Robert Keohane. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (AH)
• Ted Hopf. 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.” International Security 23(1): 170-200
• Thucydides. The Peloponnesian War. Book 1, paras 1-23, 66-88, 118-24, 140-46; Book 4, paras 37-51; BookV, Melian dialogue; Book 6, paras 84-116.
• Walt, Stephen 1999. “Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies,” International Security, 23, 4, 5-48, and responses in 24, 2, 56-73, 97-106.
• Walt, Stephen. The Origins of Alliances, chs 1,2.
• Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics, chs. 4-8.
• Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press. Ch.1, 5-8.

# Ders Öğrenme Çıktılarının Program Çıktılarına Katkısı
1 Learns the theories of the IR
Değerlendirme Sistemi
Yarıyıl Çalışmaları Katkı Oranı
1. Ara Sınav 30
1. Ödev 70
Toplam 100
1. Yıl İçinin Başarıya 50
1. Final 50
Toplam 100
AKTS - İş Yükü Etkinlik Sayı Süre (Saat) Toplam İş Yükü (Saat)
Ders Süresi (Sınav haftası dahildir: 16x toplam ders saati) 16 3 48
Sınıf Dışı Ders Çalışma Süresi(Ön çalışma, pekiştirme) 16 3 48
Ara Sınav 1 20 20
Ödev 1 20 20
Final 1 20 20
Toplam İş Yükü 156
Toplam İş Yükü / 25 (Saat) 6,24
Dersin AKTS Kredisi 6