| Ders Adı | Kodu | Yarıyıl | T+U Saat | Kredi | AKTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17Th-18Th Century Western Phılosophy | FEL 204 | 4 | 4 + 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Ön Koşul Dersleri | |
| Önerilen Seçmeli Dersler | |
| Dersin Dili | Türkçe |
| Dersin Seviyesi | Lisans |
| Dersin Türü | Zorunlu |
| Dersin Koordinatörü | Doç.Dr. İBRAHİM SAFA DAŞKAYA |
| Dersi Verenler | Dr.Öğr.Üyesi TANZER YAKAR, |
| Dersin Yardımcıları | |
| Dersin Kategorisi | Diğer |
| Dersin Amacı | Reading texts about the emergence of the modern philososphy and about the rationalist and empiricist philosophies, evaluation and examination of the general features of Enlightenment. |
| Dersin İçeriği | Evaluating and arguing the views of 17th Century Philoosphers. Prensenting the 18th Century Philosophers. Conveying the specific concepts and the debates about them in that era. |
| # | Ders Öğrenme Çıktıları | Öğretim Yöntemleri | Ölçme Yöntemleri |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clarifying the concept of method in Bacon and Descartes who are the modern philosophers | Lecture, Question-Answer, | Testing, |
| 2 | Clarifying Descartes´ understanding of substance | Lecture, Question-Answer, Discussion, | Testing, Oral Exam, |
| 3 | Arguing about the cartesian dualisms of Malebranche, Spinoza and Leibniz | Question-Answer, Discussion, | Testing, |
| 4 | Arguing the significance of Spinoza´s metaphysics in the history of philosphy | Lecture, Question-Answer, Discussion, | Testing, |
| 5 | Arguing the reasons of the emergence of the Enlightenment Philosophy | Lecture, Question-Answer, | Testing, Homework, |
| 6 | Evaluating the effects of Enlightenment on Modernity | Lecture, Question-Answer, | Testing, |
| 7 | Arguing the place of Kant in the emergence of Contemporary Philosophy | Lecture, Question-Answer, | Oral Exam, Homework, |
| 8 | Evaluating the importance of the three questions of Kant with regards to history of philosophy | Lecture, Question-Answer, | Testing, |
| Hafta | Ders Konuları | Ön Hazırlık |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction: What happened in the 17th Century? | |
| 2 | Descartes and Bacon: New Method | |
| 3 | Cartesian Philosophy: Dualist Understanding of Subtance | |
| 4 | Descartes | |
| 5 | Malebranche | |
| 6 | Spinoza | |
| 7 | Leibniz | |
| 8 | Empiricism versus Rationalism | |
| 9 | Midterm exam | |
| 10 | General Evaluation on the Kantian Philosophy | |
| 11 | Kantian Philosophy | |
| 12 | Fichte, Schelling | |
| 13 | Hegel | |
| 14 | General evaluation |
| Kaynaklar | |
|---|---|
| Ders Notu | Cevizci, Ahmet, “17.yy Batı Felsefesi Tarihi”, Asa Yayıncılık, Bursa, 2004. Mehmet Saffet, Muasır Avrupa Felsefesi, İstanbul, 1933 |
| Ders Kaynakları | Berkeley (1984) Hylas İle Philonus Arasında Üç Konuşma Çev: Sahir Sel, Sosyal Yay., İstanbul Bumin T (1996) Tartışılan Modernlik, Descartes ve Spinoza, Yapı Kredi Yay., İstanbul Hünler, S.Z (2003) Üç Adalı, Paradigma Yay., İstanbul Weber, A (1984) Felsefe Tarihi, Sosyal Yay. İstanbul Malebranche, (1989) Hakikatin Araştırılması Çev. M. Katırcıoğlu, MEB Yay., İstanbul Lebniz (1988) Monodoloji Çev. S.Kemal Yetkin, MEB Yay., İstanbul |
| Sıra | Program Çıktıları | Katkı Düzeyi | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| 1 | To acquire the skill of analytical and synthetic thinking, reading and acquainting, | X | |||||
| 2 | To be able to understand and judge the philosophical accumulations at local and universal level, | X | |||||
| 3 | To be able to do researches and to improve a method about the philosophical problems in the sources that are constituted in the field of philosophy, | X | |||||
| 4 | To be able to connect the universal problems of philosophy with the local problems, | X | |||||
| 5 | To be able to interrogate the universal problems of mankind, to be able to examine the interrogations in this field, | X | |||||
| 6 | To be able to deal with the problems of such fields as science, culture and art in a philosophical way, to recognize those questions | X | |||||
| 7 | To be able to provide the usage of interdisciplinary knowledge for the common and local problems concerning science, religion and art, | X | |||||
| 8 | To be able to understand, to solve and when necessary to direct the particular problems, | X | |||||
| 9 | To be able to narrate in writing and in words in a systematic and consistent way the knowledge possessed and suggestions for the solutions of problems, | X | |||||
| 10 | |||||||
| 11 | |||||||
| 12 | To be able to attain and to use the knowledge about philosophy and history of science. | ||||||
| Değerlendirme Sistemi | |
|---|---|
| Yarıyıl Çalışmaları | Katkı Oranı |
| 1. Ara Sınav | 70 |
| 1. Ödev | 10 |
| 1. Kısa Sınav | 10 |
| 2. Kısa Sınav | 10 |
| Toplam | 100 |
| 1. Yıl İçinin Başarıya | 50 |
| 1. Final | 50 |
| Toplam | 100 |
| AKTS - İş Yükü Etkinlik | Sayı | Süre (Saat) | Toplam İş Yükü (Saat) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (Including the exam week: 16x Total course hours) | 16 | 4 | 64 |
| Hours for off-the-classroom study (Pre-study, practice) | 16 | 4 | 64 |
| Mid-terms | 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Quiz | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Assignment | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Toplam İş Yükü | 139 | ||
| Toplam İş Yükü / 25 (Saat) | 5,56 | ||
| Dersin AKTS Kredisi | 6 | ||