Eğitim Bilgi Sistemi

Ders Bilgileri
Ders Tanımı
Ders Akışı
Dersin Prog. Çıktılarına Katkısı
Değerlendirme Sistemi
AKTS - İş Yükü

Ders Adı	Kodu	Yarıyıl	T+U Saat	Kredi	AKTS
Theorıes Of Internatıonal Relatıons (En)	ODC 517	0	3 + 0	3	6

Ön Koşul Dersleri
Önerilen Seçmeli Dersler
Dersin Dili	İngilizce
Dersin Seviyesi	YUKSEK_LISANS
Dersin Türü	Seçmeli
Dersin Koordinatörü	Arş.Gör. FURKAN HALİT YOLCU
Dersi Verenler	Prof.Dr. TUNCAY KARDAŞ,
Dersin Yardımcıları
Dersin Kategorisi	Diğer
Dersin Amacı	This module examines IR theories. In the first half of the semester, students will be exposed to a range of different theoretical approaches to International Relations. In the second half of the semester, students will be required to research and present case-studies to the class, which apply different methodological approaches to practical historical examples. Through these case studies and comparisons, students will gain a better understanding of how different government structures react to events in the international environment, and respond to external influences.
Dersin İçeriği	1: General Introduction and information on course requirements International Relations and Social Science 2: Normative International Relations Theory 3: Classical Realism 4: Structural Realism 5: Liberalism, Neoliberalism 6: The English School 7: Marxism 8: Critical Theory 9: Constructivism 10: Feminism 11: Poststructuralism 12::Postcolonialism 13: Green Theory

#	Ders Öğrenme Çıktıları	Öğretim Yöntemleri	Ölçme Yöntemleri
1	Learns the theories of the IR	Lecture, Question-Answer, Discussion,	Testing, Oral Exam, Homework,

Hafta	Ders Konuları	Ön Hazırlık
1	General Introduction and information on course requirements International Relations and Social Science
2	Normative International Relations Theory
3	Classical Realism
4	Structural Realism
5	Liberalism, Neoliberalism
6	The English School
7	Marxism
8	Critical Theory
9	Constructivism
10	Feminism
11	Poststructuralism
12	Postcolonialism
13	Green Theory
14	International Relations Theory and Globalization

Kaynaklar
Ders Notu
Ders Kaynakları	• Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith: International Relations Theories, Oxford University Press, 2013. • Robert Jackson and Georg Sørense: Introduction to International Relations Theories and Approaches, Oxford University Press,2012 • Alexander Wendt. 1992. “Anarchy Is What Stats Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2): 391-425 • Axelrod, Robert (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books, pp. 3-105, 145-91. • Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Columbia U. Press., chs. 1,2,10. • Doyle, Michael. 1986. “Liberalism in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 80 (4): 1151-69 • Fearon, James (1991). “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science,” World Politics, 43 (2), January: 169-95. • Fearon, James and Alexander Wendt. 2002. “Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View,” in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, editors, Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage), 5372 • Finnemore. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Cornell U. Press. • Hopf, Ted. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow 1955 and 1999. Cornell U. Press, ch. 1 • Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics, 1978. • John Mearsheimer. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton Company. (TGPP) • Keohane, Robert and Judith Goldstein (1993). Ideas and Foreign Policy, Cornell University Press, chs. 1, 7. • Keohane, Robert, ed. Neorealism and Its Critics. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), chs. 6,7. • Krasner, Stephen. 1999 Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. 1-42 and 153-219. • Lake, David, and Robert Powell, eds. 1999. Strategic Choice and International Relations (Princeton U. Press), chs by Lake and Powell, Frieden, and Rogowski. • Lake, David. 1996. “Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations,” International Organization, 50(1). • Levy, Jack (1992). “Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping Through a Conceptual Minefield” International Organization, 48, 2, Spring, 279-312. (Review) • Mearsheimer, John. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. NY: Norton. Chapters 1-3. • Morgenthau, Hans. 1985. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (6th ed.), Knopf, pp. 1-51. • Powell, Robert. 1991. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory.” American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1303 – 1320. • Robert Keohane, ed. 1986. Neo-Realism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press. (NIC) • Robert Keohane. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (AH) • Ted Hopf. 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.” International Security 23(1): 170-200 • Thucydides. The Peloponnesian War. Book 1, paras 1-23, 66-88, 118-24, 140-46; Book 4, paras 37-51; BookV, Melian dialogue; Book 6, paras 84-116. • Walt, Stephen 1999. “Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies,” International Security, 23, 4, 5-48, and responses in 24, 2, 56-73, 97-106. • Walt, Stephen. The Origins of Alliances, chs 1,2. • Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics, chs. 4-8. • Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press. Ch.1, 5-8.

Kaynaklar

Ders Notu

Ders Kaynakları

• Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith: International Relations Theories, Oxford University Press, 2013.
• Robert Jackson and Georg Sørense: Introduction to International Relations Theories and Approaches, Oxford University Press,2012
• Alexander Wendt. 1992. “Anarchy Is What Stats Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2): 391-425
• Axelrod, Robert (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books, pp. 3-105, 145-91.
• Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Columbia U. Press., chs. 1,2,10.
• Doyle, Michael. 1986. “Liberalism in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 80 (4): 1151-69
• Fearon, James (1991). “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science,” World Politics, 43 (2), January: 169-95.
• Fearon, James and Alexander Wendt. 2002. “Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View,” in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, editors, Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage), 5372
• Finnemore. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Cornell U. Press.
• Hopf, Ted. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow 1955 and 1999. Cornell U. Press, ch. 1
• Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics, 1978.
• John Mearsheimer. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton Company. (TGPP)
• Keohane, Robert and Judith Goldstein (1993). Ideas and Foreign Policy, Cornell University Press, chs. 1, 7.
• Keohane, Robert, ed. Neorealism and Its Critics. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), chs. 6,7.
• Krasner, Stephen. 1999 Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. 1-42 and 153-219.
• Lake, David, and Robert Powell, eds. 1999. Strategic Choice and International Relations (Princeton U. Press), chs by Lake and Powell, Frieden, and Rogowski.
• Lake, David. 1996. “Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations,” International Organization, 50(1).
• Levy, Jack (1992). “Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping Through a Conceptual Minefield” International Organization, 48, 2, Spring, 279-312. (Review)
• Mearsheimer, John. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. NY: Norton. Chapters 1-3.
• Morgenthau, Hans. 1985. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (6th ed.), Knopf, pp. 1-51.
• Powell, Robert. 1991. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory.” American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1303 – 1320.
• Robert Keohane, ed. 1986. Neo-Realism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press. (NIC)
• Robert Keohane. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (AH)
• Ted Hopf. 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.” International Security 23(1): 170-200
• Thucydides. The Peloponnesian War. Book 1, paras 1-23, 66-88, 118-24, 140-46; Book 4, paras 37-51; BookV, Melian dialogue; Book 6, paras 84-116.
• Walt, Stephen 1999. “Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies,” International Security, 23, 4, 5-48, and responses in 24, 2, 56-73, 97-106.
• Walt, Stephen. The Origins of Alliances, chs 1,2.
• Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics, chs. 4-8.
• Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press. Ch.1, 5-8.

Sıra	Program Çıktıları	Katkı Düzeyi
Sıra	Program Çıktıları	1	2	3	4	5
1	Having knowledge and thought about actual topics and problems together with their historical, social and cultural aspects Having knowledge and thought about actual topics and problems together with their historical, social and cultural aspects Having and using advanced knowledge and comprehension supported by textbooks including actual knowledge in international relations literature, materials and the other scientific resources Having and using advanced knowledge and comprehension supported by textbooks including actual knowledge in international relations literature, materials and the other scientific resources
2	Analyzing data, ideas and concepts of foreign policy and international relations, determining complex events and topics, making discussions and developing new suggestions in accordance with researches Analyzing data, ideas and concepts of foreign policy and international relations, determining complex events and topics, making discussions and developing new suggestions in accordance with researches Having conscious about professional and scientific ethics Having conscious about professional and scientific ethics
3	Having the skill about methods and techniques in reaching knowledge Having the skill about methods and techniques in reaching knowledge
4	Having skill to improve career in the jobs such as attaché and ambassador Having skill to improve career in the jobs such as attaché and ambassador
5	Introducing those who are interested in international events with the topics of international relations and teaching clearly the problems of international relations and the types of solutions Introducing those who are interested in international events with the topics of international relations and teaching clearly the problems of international relations and the types of solutions Having the skills to take initiatives, capacity for team-working and open-minded Having the skills to take initiatives, capacity for team-working and open-minded Using Turkish well, having a good written and oral communication and also having ability of empathy Using Turkish well, having a good written and oral communication and also having ability of empathy
6	Accessing, examining and elucidating with scientific methods to the knowledge of international relations and expanding literature about international relations Accessing, examining and elucidating with scientific methods to the knowledge of international relations and expanding literature about international relations

Değerlendirme Sistemi
Yarıyıl Çalışmaları	Katkı Oranı
1. Ara Sınav	30
1. Ödev	70
Toplam	100
1. Yıl İçinin Başarıya	50
1. Final	50
Toplam	100

AKTS - İş Yükü Etkinlik	Sayı	Süre (Saat)	Toplam İş Yükü (Saat)
Course Duration (Including the exam week: 16x Total course hours)	16	3	48
Hours for off-the-classroom study (Pre-study, practice)	16	3	48
Mid-terms	1	20	20
Assignment	1	20	20
Final examination	1	20	20
Toplam İş Yükü			156
Toplam İş Yükü / 25 (Saat)			6,24
Dersin AKTS Kredisi			6

Modal Heading