| Ders Adı | Kodu | Yarıyıl | T+U Saat | Kredi | AKTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hıstory Of Relıgıons Text In Foreıgn Language | FDT 507 | 0 | 3 + 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Ön Koşul Dersleri | Absent |
| Önerilen Seçmeli Dersler | Absent |
| Dersin Dili | Türkçe |
| Dersin Seviyesi | YUKSEK_LISANS |
| Dersin Türü | Seçmeli |
| Dersin Koordinatörü | Prof.Dr. FUAT AYDIN |
| Dersi Verenler | |
| Dersin Yardımcıları | Absent |
| Dersin Kategorisi | Diğer |
| Dersin Amacı | To make familiar to the text tha contribute to the emergence of History of religion as a science |
| Dersin İçeriği | To read the text of history of religions that was written in English |
| # | Ders Öğrenme Çıktıları | Öğretim Yöntemleri | Ölçme Yöntemleri |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Identify the conditions in that history of religions formed | Simulation, Problem Solving, | Testing, Homework, Performance Task, |
| 2 | Identify the changing understandings of History of religions | Simulation, Problem Solving, | Testing, Homework, Performance Task, |
| 3 | Use the concepts of history of religions | Simulation, Problem Solving, | Testing, Homework, Performance Task, |
| 4 | Recognize the pioneers of History of Religions in the west | Simulation, Problem Solving, | Testing, Homework, Performance Task, |
| 5 | Identif the changing of problems of history of religions from its beginning to now | Simulation, Problem Solving, | Testing, Homework, Performance Task, |
| 6 | Recall the fundamental features of classical approaches to the study of religion | Simulation, Problem Solving, | Testing, Homework, Performance Task, |
| Hafta | Ders Konuları | Ön Hazırlık |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | F.Max Müller, “Plea for a scince of a religion”, J. Waardenburg, Contemporory approaches to stduy of religion,Walter de Gruyter 1999, pp. 85-86. | |
| 2 | F. Maw Müller, “The comparative study of religion”, Waardenburg, op.cit., pp 89-95. | |
| 3 | Cornelius P. Tiele, “Elements of the science of Religion”, op.cit. pp. 96-104. | |
| 4 | Pire D. Chantepie de la Saussaye, “The science of Religion”, op.cit. pp. 105-108. | |
| 5 | Chantepie de la Saussaye, “Phenomenology of religion”, op.cit. pp. 109-116. | |
| 6 | Nathan Söderblom, “The origin of the belief in God”, a.g.e., s.382-385. | |
| 7 | William Brede Kristensen, “On the study of religious phenomena”, op.cit. pp.390-398. | |
| 8 | Mid-term examination | |
| 9 | Gerardus von der Leeuw, “Religion in esence and manifestation”, op.cit. pp. 412-425. | |
| 10 | Joachim Wach, “The meaning and task of history of religions”, op.cit. pp. 5/8-526. | |
| 11 | Carl Gustav Junag, “On Psychology of religion”, op.cit. pp. 528-534. | |
| 12 | Raffeale Pettazzoni, “History” and “Phenomenology” in the science of religion,”, op.cit. pp. 639-642. | |
| 13 | Hendrik Krammer, “On the presuppositions and limits of the science of religion”, op.cit. pp. 644-653. | |
| 14 | General evaluation |
| Kaynaklar | |
|---|---|
| Ders Notu | Jacques Waardenburg, Contemporary approaches to study of religion, Walter de Gruyter 1999 |
| Ders Kaynakları | 1.Joachim Wach, Dinler Tarihi, çev. Fuat Aydın, Ataç Yayınları, İstanbul. |
| Sıra | Program Çıktıları | Katkı Düzeyi | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| 1 | |||||||
| 2 | X | ||||||
| 3 | X | ||||||
| 4 | X | ||||||
| 5 | X | ||||||
| 6 | X | ||||||
| 7 | X | ||||||
| 8 | X | ||||||
| 9 | X | ||||||
| Değerlendirme Sistemi | |
|---|---|
| Yarıyıl Çalışmaları | Katkı Oranı |
| 1. Ara Sınav | 60 |
| 1. Kısa Sınav | 10 |
| 1. Ödev | 20 |
| 2. Kısa Sınav | 10 |
| Toplam | 100 |
| 1. Yıl İçinin Başarıya | 50 |
| 1. Final | 50 |
| Toplam | 100 |
| AKTS - İş Yükü Etkinlik | Sayı | Süre (Saat) | Toplam İş Yükü (Saat) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (Including the exam week: 16x Total course hours) | 16 | 3 | 48 |
| Hours for off-the-classroom study (Pre-study, practice) | 16 | 3 | 48 |
| Mid-terms | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Quiz | 2 | 10 | 20 |
| Assignment | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Final examination | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Toplam İş Yükü | 147 | ||
| Toplam İş Yükü / 25 (Saat) | 5,88 | ||
| Dersin AKTS Kredisi | 6 | ||