Course Name Code Semester T+U Hours Credit ECTS
Anayasa Şikayeti ve Bireysel Başvuru Yolu KAH 526 0 3 + 0 3 6
Precondition Courses <p>NONE</p>
Recommended Optional Courses
Course Language Turkish
Course Level yuksek_lisans
Course Type Optional
Course Coordinator Dr.Öğr.Üyesi ALPER IŞIK
Course Lecturers
Course Assistants
Course Category
Course Objective

Elaborating the individual application to the Constitutional Court as a subfield of Constitutional Law.

Course Content

The purpose of the constitutional complaint is to eliminate violations of fundamental rights and freedoms. In our country, the constitutional complaint institution was accepted under the name of "Individual Application" with the changes made in the 1982 Constitution in 2010. The purpose of the acceptance of the individual application is to reduce the number of applications made to the European Court of Human Rights. In this course, the scope of the constitutional complaint in our country, the application conditions, important individual application decisions, and the effects and consequences of the decisions made as a result of individual application will be examined.

# Course Learning Outcomes Teaching Methods Assessment Methods
1 Expresses the importance of protecting fundamental rights and freedoms. Lecture, Question-Answer, Discussion, Brain Storming, Testing, Homework,
2 Can critically interpret the structure, function and control types of the Constitutional Court. Lecture, Question-Answer, Discussion, Brain Storming, Testing, Homework,
3 Gaining the ability to transfer information about individual application to the Constitutional Court to the field of application Lecture, Question-Answer, Discussion, Brain Storming, Testing, Homework,
4 Have a theoretical background for individual application to the Constitutional Court. Lecture, Question-Answer, Discussion, Brain Storming, Testing, Homework,
5 Explain the rights in the Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights. Lecture, Question-Answer, Discussion, Brain Storming, Testing, Homework,
6 Relate the decisions of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights. Lecture, Question-Answer, Discussion, Brain Storming, Testing, Homework,
7 Has a good command of Individual Application Decisions that Affect the Public. Lecture, Question-Answer, Discussion, Brain Storming, Testing, Homework,
8 Identifies the violations of rights subject to individual application and determines the solutions. Lecture, Question-Answer, Discussion, Brain Storming, Testing, Homework,
9 It prepares an individual application petition to the Constitutional Court. Lecture, Question-Answer, Discussion, Brain Storming, Testing, Homework,
10 Understands the Importance of Including the Constitutional Complaint in Our Legal System. Lecture, Question-Answer, Discussion, Brain Storming, Testing, Homework,
Week Course Topics Preliminary Preparation
1 The Concept of Constitutional Complaint, The Birth and Development of the Institution, General Rules Regarding Constitutional Complaint Doç. Dr. Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Türkiye Uygulamasının Almanya ve Strazburg Ekseninde Karşılaştırılması, Nisan 2017, 1. Baskı, related sections
2 Inclusion of the Constitutional Complaint in Our Legal System Doç. Dr. Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Türkiye Uygulamasının Almanya ve Strazburg Ekseninde Karşılaştırılması, Nisan 2017, 1. Baskı, related sections
3 The Admissibility Criteria in the Constitutional Complaint and the Examination of the Constitutional Constitutional Court Decisions I Doç. Dr. Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Türkiye Uygulamasının Almanya ve Strazburg Ekseninde Karşılaştırılması, Nisan 2017, 1. Baskı, related sections
4 The Admissibility Criteria in the Constitutional Complaint and the Examination of the Constitutional Constitutional Court Decisions on These II Doç. Dr. Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Türkiye Uygulamasının Almanya ve Strazburg Ekseninde Karşılaştırılması, Nisan 2017, 1. Baskı, related sections
5 Examination of Merit Criteria in the Constitutional Complaint in the Light of Constitutional Court Decisions I Doç. Dr. Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Türkiye Uygulamasının Almanya ve Strazburg Ekseninde Karşılaştırılması, Nisan 2017, 1. Baskı, related sections
6 Examination of Merit Criteria in Constitutional Complaint in the Light of Constitutional Court Decisions II Doç. Dr. Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Türkiye Uygulamasının Almanya ve Strazburg Ekseninde Karşılaştırılması, Nisan 2017, 1. Baskı, related sections
7 Individual Application Organization of the Constitutional Court Doç. Dr. Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Türkiye Uygulamasının Almanya ve Strazburg Ekseninde Karşılaştırılması, Nisan 2017, 1. Baskı, related sections
8 Exam Doç. Dr. Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Türkiye Uygulamasının Almanya ve Strazburg Ekseninde Karşılaştırılması, Nisan 2017, 1. Baskı, related sections
9 Comparison of ECtHR Decisions and Individual Application Decisions of the Constitutional Court Doç. Dr. Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Türkiye Uygulamasının Almanya ve Strazburg Ekseninde Karşılaştırılması, Nisan 2017, 1. Baskı, related sections
10 Comparison of the Constitutional Court's Individual Application Decisions and the Decisions Resulted from the Norm Inspection Doç. Dr. Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Türkiye Uygulamasının Almanya ve Strazburg Ekseninde Karşılaştırılması, Nisan 2017, 1. Baskı, related sections
11 Types of Decisions Made by the Constitutional Court as a Result of Individual Application, Effects and Results of the Constitutional Court Decisions Doç. Dr. Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Türkiye Uygulamasının Almanya ve Strazburg Ekseninde Karşılaştırılması, Nisan 2017, 1. Baskı, related sections
12 Examination of Individual Application Decisions Making a Public Impact I Doç. Dr. Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Türkiye Uygulamasının Almanya ve Strazburg Ekseninde Karşılaştırılması, Nisan 2017, 1. Baskı, related sections
13 Examination of Individual Application Decisions Having a Public Effect II Doç. Dr. Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Türkiye Uygulamasının Almanya ve Strazburg Ekseninde Karşılaştırılması, Nisan 2017, 1. Baskı, related sections
14 Examination of Individual Application Decisions Having a Public Effect III Doç. Dr. Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Türkiye Uygulamasının Almanya ve Strazburg Ekseninde Karşılaştırılması, Nisan 2017, 1. Baskı, related sections
Resources
Course Notes
Course Resources

Doç. Dr. Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru, Türkiye Uygulamasının Almanya ve Strazburg Ekseninde Karşılaştırılması, Nisan 2017, 1. Baskı

Tolga Şirin, Bireysel Başvuru Hakkı,Ekim 2015

Doç. Dr. Nedim Meriç, Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Ramazan Korkmaz, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru ile ilgili Temel Mevzuat, Nisan 2020, 3. Baskı, 

Evaluation System
Semester Studies Contribution Rate
Total 0
Total 0
ECTS - Workload Activity Quantity Time (Hours) Total Workload (Hours)
Total Workload 0
Total Workload / 25 (Hours) 0
dersAKTSKredisi 6